![bibleworks 10 interlinear using bibleworks 10 interlinear using](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/974ZEZgHuiE/maxresdefault.jpg)
- Bibleworks 10 interlinear using how to#
- Bibleworks 10 interlinear using software#
- Bibleworks 10 interlinear using trial#
- Bibleworks 10 interlinear using Pc#
- Bibleworks 10 interlinear using mac#
So, I would say answer a few basic questions:ġ.
Bibleworks 10 interlinear using Pc#
(I have used Logos on the PC but found it slow and bloated.) If the answer is Mac, I tell them go with Accordance.
![bibleworks 10 interlinear using bibleworks 10 interlinear using](https://img.informer.com/screenshots/1520/1520573_1.jpg)
If a friend wants original language bible research software, my first question is "What platform do you plan to run it on?" If the answer is Windows, I tell them go with BibleWorks. I did run BibleWorks under Parallels (an emulator) on theMac for over 2 years, and it is really not worth it.
![bibleworks 10 interlinear using bibleworks 10 interlinear using](https://www.accordancebible.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Imported-Bible-Works-notes.png)
My honest opinion having used both programs quite a bit, is that if I really wanted to use a PC I would get BibleWorks, and if I wanted to use a Mac, I would get Accordance. Time consuming and repetitive, but it can be done. However, this is more of a convenience thing, since you can always do the formatting after the sport is completed. They give you the ability to set up multiple export configurations that can be saved, and the things you can configure are more robust. What you get is excellent and very inexpensive, but many resources available in Accordance simply are not (and probably never will be) available in BibleWorks. However, BibleWorks has a philosophy that limits the amount of resources available. It is much less expensive to get a robust set up of original language texts, lexical resources, grammars, and English texts in BibleWorks than either Accordance or Logos. Since this is an Accordance forum, but you asked for some BibleWorks advantages, I will let others give you Accordance advantages and will mainly focus on BibleWorks advantages. Some things I prefer in the way BibleWorks does things, but many things I prefer the way they are done in Accordance.
![bibleworks 10 interlinear using bibleworks 10 interlinear using](https://i.etsystatic.com/11654514/r/il/4a6ad6/2270701436/il_794xN.2270701436_6et0.jpg)
I have not found much that I want to do that can be done in one but not the other. I would say that the power and capabilities of the two are very similar. I am a pastor rather than academic scholar, but I used BibleWorks for years, and have now been using Accordance for a little over a year. With that, I leave you to the true Academics.
Bibleworks 10 interlinear using how to#
It's just easier to "remember" how to get around and set up your workflows and, remember "how" you set it up. Reporting on that is always "somewhat" subjective, however, we do know some things about human interactions that we did not understand ten years ago.Īccordance has done a better job in this area than Bibleworks in my opinion.
Bibleworks 10 interlinear using software#
Incredibly powerful software that does not lend itself to "easy memory" of workflow should be a thing of the past, sadly we often find that is not the case. Workflow ( for me) was much easier to establish because of this. One thing I will say is this: The UI and learning curve is much more fluid in Accordance than Bibleworks. My "guess" is that it is those more in the Academic world that you need to hear from. However, there are many here who use Accordance far and away much closer to it's true potential in Original Language studies and as a research tool. If you are doing scholar level work ( which it sounds like ) then I think you need to hear from those here who do the same type work.įor instance, I am a Parish Priest, thus my work is more in prep for sermons, teaching classes etc along with my personal growth, thus I use Accordance in a certain way. I'm not really interested in subjective preferences, but more objective observations, eg, this type of search can be done on Accordance but not on BibleWorks.ĭear Robrecht: I think it might be helpful if you could give a little info concerning your type of studies.Īccordance, like BibleWorks is incredibly powerful and customizable. I'm also wondering if there are specific advantages of BibleWorks over Accordance, if this can be discussed without rancor.
Bibleworks 10 interlinear using mac#
I really don't want to any Mac v PC polemics. powerful analytic charts and lists for any search results parallel panes which scroll together, cross highlight, dynamic interlinear, etc. a broader range of texts, commentaries and other study aids Ĥ. powerful "amplifying" from any selected word or phrase to any other resource in Accordanceģ. If I were to buy a Mac laptop, what would be the advantages of Accordance over BibleWorks?Ģ. I've only ever used PCs, and I don't think I would like the disadvantages of using an emulator. Can anyone point me to a list of advantages of Accordance over BibleWorks?
Bibleworks 10 interlinear using trial#
I'm getting ready to do a trial of BibleWorks, but I've been reading some very good things about Accordance.